Unfiltered Orange

What is “Unfiltered Orange”?
Employing a combination of sources derived from RSS Feeds, Web Alerts, and Industry Newsletters and using technology developed by Twitter, Unfiltered Orange provides legal professionals with quick reference electronic discovery related updates via short headlines, link addresses, and time stamps. By “clicking” on the timestamp of individual updates on the Unfiltered Orange web page, users are quickly taken to active links which provide direct access to actual news/note content.

Why objective updates in such a highly competitive market?
Orange Legal Technologies firmly believes that presenting industry information in an objective manner will increase the capability of electronic discovery consumers – whether law firm, corporation, or governmentally based – to make informed decisions. OrangeLT™ believes informed decisions lead to right decisions and also believes - based on its technology and partnerships - that it will be considered as a right choice by potential clients and partners in many ESI related litigation, audit, and investigation situations.

Accessing Updates via RSS and Twitter
Direct RSS Feed of updates: click here.
Twitter Feed presented updates: click here.

Print Email Add to Favorites Help

Do you understand "Conceptual Search"?

by wrrobinson

Written by Herbert L. Roitblat, Ph.D., provided below is a short overview of conceptual search in relation to electronic discovery.

 Introduction: Conceptual Search in Electronic Discovery 

According to the Radicati Group, the average business mailbox contains 4.3 GB of potentially discoverable ESI. The burden of dealing with that volume is obvious. Automated tools to help identify responsive and privileged documents are being used more and more as the only viable way to manage these massive volumes of information. Electronic Discovery professionals have been looking for ways to limit the number of documents that need to be reviewed, because review is usually the most expensive part of eDiscovery. Most commonly, these methods revolve around some kind of content search to distinguish those documents that are potentially responsive from those that are not. Content search also has the potential to make document review itself more efficient and effective, further reducing the burden.

To review or download the complete article, see below or click here or visit Litilaw @ http://tinyurl.com/d6geo3.

Commentspost new comment